
A Life of Picasso: 1907-17: Painter of Modern Life v. 2
Customer Review: A Fan Explains His Hero
Where does genius come from? What are the motives? What are the stars that guide?
Picasso was arguably the most original and influential artist of the 20th century. In volume one of four planned volumes (three of which have been produced to date), John Richardson collaborates with Marilyn McCully to establish the detailed record of how Picasso developed as a man and an artist through the early Rose period. The book is made richer by Richardson’s friendship with the artist and his access to Picasso’s memories of key events. But he doesn’t slavishly accept Picasso’s version (except in damning Matisse as inferior to Picasso) but rather checks out the different versions and picks what seems to make the most sense.
Picasso’s fanatic desire to succeed was fueled in part by his contempt for his father’s failed career as an artist and his father’s views that Picasso should follow in his footsteps. Picasso also needed to be treated as special, more than most of us. Groveling before exploitive dealers built a lifelong passion to be in charge. Picasso also knew that Paris was where he had to shine and suffered greatly to make his success there. His struggles will impress you.
Where the book is unequaled in my experience is in tracking down the sources of Picasso’s images, gestures, styles, and innovations. The book is filled with black and white images from the works of other artists, Picasso’s notebooks, photographs of the scenes and subjects, and related works that Picasso did. From these, you get a better sense of Picasso as a synthesizer of styles and modes.
In closely examining Picasso’s work from these years, it’s easy to develop superficial impressions of what sort of man did those paintings. For instance, the paintings of women show someone who feels compelled to alternately adore and dominate women . . . especially sexually. Learning later that he locked his mistress into the studio even on the hottest days when he left adds to that impression.
The book provides other powerful insights of this sort by relating the heavy use of opium by Picasso and his circle of artist friends during the Blue period. A lot of the models seem stoned in those paintings. Could it be that they were? Picasso loved to paint the circus performers and one of his first mistresses was one. Could it be that those performers are really emotional self-portraits? The book isn’t clear on that point, but the possibility of the interpretation will occur to you.
A few central mysteries are left undeveloped. Why did Picasso stick so long with styles that he later abandoned and which didn’t sell well when he was very poor? Picasso admitted to Richardson that the Blue and Rose periods had been mistakes. Why did Picasso slow down his production at times when he had contracts and shows upcoming? How did Picasso incorporate his love for poetry into his paintings?
At times Richardson is over the top in his fawning. Here’s an example. Picasso is described as clearly one of the great poets of the 20th century, but Richardson doesn’t reveal any evidence . . . nor was Picasso doing any poetry writing at the time of this volume. I suspect that the fawning was the price of admission for his access which rewards us in other ways.
Ultimately, the book’s main weakness is that the images are not in color. Fortunately, color is less important to Picasso’s work during this period than in later periods. Perhaps there will be another edition at some point that will bring the full dimensions of the work to bear at least for the masterpieces.
Enjoy your immersion in Picasso’s chaotic world.
-
Launched in 1984, this is a RICH CHYPRE (mossy/woody) fragrance. This was the first fragrance from Paloma Picasso (daughter of the artist Pablo Picasso). Originally called Mon Parfum, it attracted considerable attention and won two FiFi awards. The flacon followed one of Palomas^ favourite themes, a circle within a circle and was inspired by an earring she had made for Tiffany. Top Notes : lemon, bergamot, angelica, hyacinth, ylang-ylang; Heart Notes : rose, jasmine, mimosa, cilantro; Base Notes : oak moss, iris, sandalwood, patchouli, amber, musk, honey.
Read more..
Paloma Picasso Perfume by Paloma Picasso 50 ml Eau De Parfum Spray for Women Womens Perfume Design House: Paloma Picasso Type: Eau De Parfum Spray Size: 50 ml Recommended Wear: Daytime Wear Gender: Female Fragrance Family: Citrus, Stylish and Woody Fragrance Fragrance Notes: Paloma Picasso Perfume by Paloma Picasso, Created by the design house of paloma picasso in 1984, paloma picasso is classified as a refined, woody, mossy fragrance. This feminine scent possesses a blend of many florals along with citrus, woods, and green. 100% Genuine Brand Names
Read more..

Read more..
Saturday’s Agenda, June 28 - Miami Herald
Items contributed must be received at least two days in advance at Calendar Desk, The Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Fifth Floor Newsroom, Miami, FL 33132-1693. To submit items online, go to MiamiHerald.com, click on Calendar of Events and click Add
American Sports - American Reporter
LOS ANGELES — Yankees manager Ralph Houk had a unique challenge to deal with in 1961. With the expansion of the American League to include the Los Angeles Angels, his New York Yankees faced 7,700-mile road trips. So, prior to an 11-day, 12-game
A Life of Picasso: Triumphant Years, 1917-1932 v. 3 Customer Review: Valuable Insights into Picasso’s Sources and Methods
If you think you know Picasso’s work, this book will convince you otherwise. John Richardson has done a tremendous service by sorting out when Picasso produced his greatest works between 1917 and 1932, what sources he “borrowed” from, what he was trying to accomplish, and how all of these works affected his career. This book was quite a revelation to me. Simply by seeing a lot of his work (as you can do at Musee Picasso, for example), you quickly realize that Picasso constantly copied himself. And, of course, it is well known that he borrowed much while trying to establish a style and while working with Braque to develop cubism. But Picasso borrowed early and often in ways I didn’t realize. In that sense, he was a supreme stylist who could execute someone else’s idea in a more profound way. I came away with a new appreciation for that aspect of his talent.
While Picasso was alive, very little was said in books about his mistreatment of women and the motives behind his paintings of his wives and lovers. While his second life was alive, people were still pretty circumspect on this point. But now we know that Picasso was louse when it came to women and his family. This book gives you the full story of his first marriage, relationship with his young mistress who inspired so many joyous works, Marie-Therese Walter, and his constant attraction to prostitutes.
There are some other surprises in this book including how central his work with ballet was in creating interest in his paintings and sculptures. It was through Diaghilev that Picasso met his first wife, Olga Khokhlova, a ballerina in the Ballets Russes. Picasso decided it was time to settle down and marry. Despite having had long relationships with women before, he now was looking for someone who would help make him respectable. In the process, Picasso adopted the lifestyle of one of the first wealthy artists (famously being driven around in one of the world’s most expensive cars by a chauffeur in the middle of the world-wide economic depression).
As good as John Richardson is on those subjects, he can be most annoying in other ways. For example, Mr. Richardson seems to have an obsession with Jean Cocteau and writes a lot about him even though Picasso didn’t like Cocteau very much and Cocteau didn’t influence Picasso very much either. Mr. Richardson also has a writing style that can be enormously elusive, describing what happened without saying anything. Picasso’s wife seems to have had a lot of physical and mental problems but these are mentioned without providing much real information other than when they occurred. A greater problem comes in that Mr. Richardson likes to drop in lots of French phrases (I read French so I had no problem), but if you don’t read French it makes the text harder to follow. Some will also find some of Mr. Richardson’s put downs of those who disagree with as being rude and high handed. Perhaps the most annoying problem comes in using academic words to describe distasteful aspects of Picasso’s personality and behavior. It’s like putting lipstick on a pig.
But I advise you to read the book while being prepared for its weaknesses. I’m afraid there is no substitute. The generously represented art makes up for the weaknesses.
Customer Review: Not up to the mark
My copy was warped and the front cover was scratched. For a book of this quality and price I would expect it to be delivered in pristine condition.
Pablo Picasso : official web site